Current:Home > InvestLawyers fined for filing bogus case law created by ChatGPT -Stellar Wealth Sphere
Lawyers fined for filing bogus case law created by ChatGPT
View
Date:2025-04-13 21:57:42
A federal judge on Thursday imposed $5,000 fines on two lawyers and a law firm in an unprecedented instance in which ChatGPT was blamed for their submission of fictitious legal research in an aviation injury claim.
Judge P. Kevin Castel said they acted in bad faith. But he credited their apologies and remedial steps taken in explaining why harsher sanctions were not necessary to ensure they or others won't again let artificial intelligence tools prompt them to produce fake legal history in their arguments.
"Technological advances are commonplace and there is nothing inherently improper about using a reliable artificial intelligence tool for assistance," Castel wrote. "But existing rules impose a gatekeeping role on attorneys to ensure the accuracy of their filings."
A Texas judge earlier this month ordered attorneys to attest that they would not use ChatGPT or other generative artificial intelligence technology to write legal briefs because the AI tool can invent facts.
The judge said the lawyers and their firm, Levidow, Levidow & Oberman, P.C., "abandoned their responsibilities when they submitted non-existent judicial opinions with fake quotes and citations created by the artificial intelligence tool ChatGPT, then continued to stand by the fake opinions after judicial orders called their existence into question."
- Texas judge bans filings solely created by AI after ChatGPT made up cases
- A lawyer used ChatGPT to prepare a court filing. It went horribly awry.
In a statement, the law firm said it would comply with Castel's order, but added: "We respectfully disagree with the finding that anyone at our firm acted in bad faith. We have already apologized to the Court and our client. We continue to believe that in the face of what even the Court acknowledged was an unprecedented situation, we made a good faith mistake in failing to believe that a piece of technology could be making up cases out of whole cloth."
The firm said it was considering whether to appeal.
Bogus cases
Castel said the bad faith resulted from the failures of the attorneys to respond properly to the judge and their legal adversaries when it was noticed that six legal cases listed to support their March 1 written arguments did not exist.
The judge cited "shifting and contradictory explanations" offered by attorney Steven A. Schwartz. He said attorney Peter LoDuca lied about being on vacation and was dishonest about confirming the truth of statements submitted to Castel.
At a hearing earlier this month, Schwartz said he used the artificial intelligence-powered chatbot to help him find legal precedents supporting a client's case against the Colombian airline Avianca for an injury incurred on a 2019 flight.
Microsoft has invested some $1 billion in OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT.
The chatbot, which generates essay-like answers to prompts from users, suggested several cases involving aviation mishaps that Schwartz hadn't been able to find through usual methods used at his law firm. Several of those cases weren't real, misidentified judges or involved airlines that didn't exist.
The made-up decisions included cases titled Martinez v. Delta Air Lines, Zicherman v. Korean Air Lines and Varghese v. China Southern Airlines.
The judge said one of the fake decisions generated by the chatbot "have some traits that are superficially consistent with actual judicial decisions" but he said other portions contained "gibberish" and were "nonsensical."
In a separate written opinion, the judge tossed out the underlying aviation claim, saying the statute of limitations had expired.
Lawyers for Schwartz and LoDuca did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
- In:
- Technology
veryGood! (6137)
Related
- Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
- Wisconsin prison warden quits amid lockdown, federal smuggling investigation
- Simone Biles' greatest move had nothing to do with winning her ninth US title | Opinion
- The muted frenzy in the courtroom when Donald Trump was convicted of felonies in New York
- Backstage at New York's Jingle Ball with Jimmy Fallon, 'Queer Eye' and Meghan Trainor
- Austin Cindric scores stunning NASCAR win at Gateway when Ryan Blaney runs out of gas
- West Virginia hotel where several people were sickened had no carbon monoxide detectors
- South Korea says North Korea is sending even more balloons carrying garbage across border
- McConnell absent from Senate on Thursday as he recovers from fall in Capitol
- Florida Panthers return to Stanley Cup Final with Game 6 win against New York Rangers
Ranking
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Organizers say record-setting drag queen story time reading kicks off Philadelphia Pride Month
- Hailey Bieber's Pregnancy Style Will Have You Saying Baby, Baby, Baby, Oh
- Toyota RAV4 Hybrid vs. RAV4 Prime: How to find the right compact SUV for you
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- 'I'm prepared to (expletive) somebody up': Tommy Pham addresses dust-up with Brewers
- Trump Media stock drops in Friday trading after former president's guilty verdict
- Is a living trust right for you? Here's what to know
Recommendation
Trump's 'stop
Jack in the Box tackles fast-food inflation by launching $4 munchies menu
Firefighters battle blazes across drought-stricken parts of Florida
From tracking your bag to VPN, 7 tech tips for a smooth vacation
DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
Rupert Murdoch, 93, marries fifth wife Elena Zhukova: See the newlyweds
Swimmer Katie Ledecky on Chinese doping scandal and the Paris Olympics
A mass parachute jump over Normandy kicks off commemorations for the 80th anniversary of D-Day