Current:Home > reviewsSignalHub Quantitative Think Tank Center:Trump may testify in sex abuse defamation trial, but the court has limited what he can say -Stellar Wealth Sphere
SignalHub Quantitative Think Tank Center:Trump may testify in sex abuse defamation trial, but the court has limited what he can say
Johnathan Walker View
Date:2025-04-08 01:10:13
NEW YORK (AP) — Former President Donald Trump has told the public for years what he thinks of E. Jean Carroll,SignalHub Quantitative Think Tank Center the writer who claims he sexually assaulted her in the 1990s. Now he has a chance to talk to a jury about her — but within limits he might well test.
Trump could testify as soon as Monday in the defamation trial over his 2019 comments branding Carroll a liar who faked a sexual attack to sell a memoir. He plans to be in court as the New York trial resumes after a weekend break.
Because a different jury found last year that Trump sexually abused Carroll, U.S. District Judge Judge Lewis A. Kaplan has ruled that if the former president takes the stand now, he won’t be allowed to say she concocted her allegation or that she was motivated by financial or political considerations.
But even while just watching the proceedings, the voluble ex-president and current Republican front-runner hasn’t checked his contempt for the case.
While Carroll testified last week, he complained to his lawyers about a “witch hunt” and a “con job” loudly enough so that the judge threatened to throw Trump out of the courtroom if he kept it up. Trump piped down and stayed in court, then held a news conference where he deplored the “nasty judge.”
“It’s a disgrace, frankly, what’s happening,” Trump told reporters, repeating his claim that Carroll’s allegation was “a made-up, fabricated story.”
Besides tangling with Kaplan, Trump bucked the New York state judge in his recent civil business fraud trial involving claims that he inflated his wealth. Trump, who denies any wrongdoing, delivered a brief closing argument of sorts without committing to rules for summations and assailed the judge from the witness stand. He also was fined a total of $15,000 for what the judge deemed violations of a gag order concerning comments about court staffers. Trump’s attorneys are appealing the order.
In Carroll’s case, her lawyers have implored the judge to make Trump swear, before any testimony, that he understands and accepts the court’s restrictions on what he can say.
“There are any number of reasons why Mr. Trump might perceive a personal or political benefit from intentionally turning this trial into a circus,” attorney Roberta Kaplan wrote in a letter to the judge, who is no relation.
Trump is contending with four criminal cases as well as the civil fraud case and Carroll’s lawsuit as the presidential primary season gets into gear. He has been juggling court and campaign appearances, using both to argue that he’s being persecuted by Democrats terrified of his possible election.
Trump is expected to travel after Monday’s court session to an evening campaign event in New Hampshire, which holds its Republican presidential primary Tuesday.
His trips to court at times also have amplified media coverage of developments that he likes — such as an accounting professor’s testimony for Trump’s defense in the fraud trial — and his criticisms of developments that he doesn’t.
He regularly addressed the news cameras waiting outside the fraud trial in a New York state court. Cameras aren’t allowed in the federal courthouse where the Carroll trial is taking place, so he at one point left and held a news conference at one of his New York buildings even as his accuser continued testifying against him.
“I’m here because Donald Trump assaulted me, and when I wrote about it, he said it never happened. He lied, and he shattered my reputation,” Carroll, a former longtime Elle magazine advice columnist, told jurors and Trump while he was still in court.
Trump doesn’t have to attend or give testimony in the civil case. He stayed away last year from the prior trial, where a different jury awarded Carroll $5 million after deciding that Trump sexually abused her in 1996 and made defamatory comments about her in 2022. Trump is appealing that verdict.
For complex legal reasons, Carroll’s defamation claims were divided between two lawsuits. Hence the second trial, where she’s seeking over $10 million in damages.
Trump has said his lawyers advised him not to dignify the first trial by attending it. He’s attending the second one, he’s said, because of what he views as the judge’s animus.
Trump lawyer Alina Habba told the court in a letter that he might take the stand because, even with the judge’s restrictions, “he can still offer considerable testimony in his defense.”
Among other things, he can testify about his state of mind when he made the statements that got him sued and about how his comments came as Carroll was doing media interviews and journalists were asking him about her, Habba wrote.
She also suggested he could “show his lack of ill will or spite” by talking about how he “corrected” his initial denial of having ever met Carroll.
The revision happened after a reporter called Trump’s attention to a 1987 photo of him, Carroll and their then-spouses at a charity event. Trump responded that he was “standing with my coat on in a line — give me a break.”
The Associated Press typically does not name people who say they have been sexually assaulted unless they come forward publicly, as Carroll has done.
veryGood! (34139)
Related
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- Coinbase lays off around 20% of its workforce as crypto downturn continues
- 2 dead, 5 hurt during Texas party shooting, police say
- As Climate Change Hits the Southeast, Communities Wrestle with Politics, Funding
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- Cultivated meat: Lab-grown meat without killing animals
- The Pence-Harris Showdown Came up Well Short of an Actual ‘Debate’ on Climate Change
- An Oil Giant’s Wall Street Fall: The World is Sending the Industry Signals, but is Exxon Listening?
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- These 35 Belt Bags Under $35 Look So Much More Expensive Than They Actually Are
Ranking
- Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
- Kim Kardashian Proves Her Heart Points North West With Sweet 10th Birthday Tribute
- Be on the lookout for earthworms on steroids that jump a foot in the air and shed their tails
- Minimum wage just increased in 23 states and D.C. Here's how much
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- See the Major Honor King Charles III Just Gave Queen Camilla
- BP Pledges to Cut Oil and Gas Production 40 Percent by 2030, but Some Questions Remain
- Ukraine's Elina Svitolina missed a Harry Styles show to play Wimbledon. Now, Styles has an invitation for her.
Recommendation
Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
Nature is Critical to Slowing Climate Change, But It Can Only Do So If We Help It First
Inside Clean Energy: The Case for Optimism
In a Dry State, Farmers Use Oil Wastewater to Irrigate Their Fields, but is it Safe?
Travis Hunter, the 2
The Biomass Industry Expands Across the South, Thanks in Part to UK Subsidies. Critics Say it’s Not ‘Carbon Neutral’
Protests Target a ‘Carbon Bomb’ Linking Two Major Pipelines Outside Boston
Southwest Airlines' #epicfail takes social media by storm
Tags
Like
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- Warming Trends: Farming for City Dwellers, an Upbeat Climate Podcast and Soil Bacteria That May Outsmart Warming
- Warming Trends: What Happens Once We Stop Shopping, Nano-Devices That Turn Waste Heat into Power and How Your Netflix Consumption Warms the Planet